Excellent well supported post.
I think the consensus is
5w20 produces slighly better fuel economy at the expense of slightly less protection.
I agree the difference between 5w20 and 5w30 is small, especially when comparing two synthetic brands such as Mobil1.
The questions raised earlier (like the orginal post) take us on a slightly different path:
- Why is 5w20 not recommended for use anywhere outside of North America on any vehicle?
- There are thousands of North American cars exported to other countries why can't you buy 5w20 anywhere outside North America?
- Is there any documentation showing 5w20 protects better for any engine then 5w30? (i.e. an oil analysis, review or anything)
- Environmental laws in Europe are more strict, why is their equivalent to the EPA not insisting 5w20 be used?
I think we drove roberttroll away because we kept circling back to these.
The fact that 5w20 is harder (redline UK sells it) to find outside NA , means nothing to me. There are oils in Europe that are not available in NA. Mobil LL Special G 5W-30 for GM vehicles, and Mobil SHC Formula MB 5W-30 for Mercedes Benz are only in Europe. Why would GM and MB require a special oil in Europe that is not available in NA? Heck i cannot find 10w30 on the Mobil1 UK web site. Why would 10w30 not be available? And i can find no regular 5w30, just the "special" GM blend.
Check out the specs for 5w30 in the uk:
Typical Properties
Mobil LL Special G 5W-30
Viscosity, ASTM D 445
cSt @ 40Âş C 69.1
cSt @ 100Âş C 11.8
Sulfated Ash, wt%, ASTM D 874 1.4
Phosphorous, wt%, ASTM D4951 0.09
Flash Point, ÂşC, ASTM D 92 226
Density @15Âş C kg/l, ASTM D 4052 0.86
Pour Point, ÂşC, ASTM D 97 -36
Now check out 5w30 in NA
Typical Properties
Mobil 1 5W-30
SAE Grade 5W-30
Viscosity, ASTM D 445
cSt @ 40Âş C 64.8
cSt @ 100Âş C 11.3
Viscosity Index, ASTM D 2270 169
Sulfated Ash, wt%, ASTM D 874 1.0
HTHS Viscosity, mPa·s @ 150ºC ASTM D 4683 3.09
Pour Point, ÂşC, ASTM D 5949 -48
Flash Point, ÂşC, ASTM D 92 230
Density @15Âş C kg/l, ASTM D 4052 0.80
They dont match - I am betting that the difference lies solely with standards set by the ACEA (European Auto manufacturers association).
I accept the fact that a modern engine with tighter tolerances requires something a little thinner in order to sufficiently lubricate the top end. Loss of lubrication = more wear.
I also accept the fact that just because a different oil is recommended outside of NA, that does not necessate a CAFE conspiracy theory. Europe seems to have a different standard, and i bet it costs $$$ to certify oils. So a US car company tells it's overseas customers to go with the next best most available thing 5w30. Which coincidentally does not match the US spec for 5w30.
If environmental lawn in Europe are MORE strict then how come none of their Diesels meet California Emissions?
No you didnt drive me away - the questions you keep asking i feel have been answered quite sufficiently. This horse has long since gone to the glue factory. You either accept what the manufacturer tells you or you dont.